🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Development

Observers said the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for data to develop their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be utilized for training AI models.

“Training on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free version of Spotify”. The executive said it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.